Belinda was sowing divisiveness in the Conservative Party of Canada long before she left.
Belinda always said she was for gay marriage like many Red Tories in the conservative party. But now I have found the connection between her rabid support of a conservative youth wing and gay marriage. The excerpt below indicates that the so called conservative youth wing that she was supporting the creation of during the Montreal Policy Convention was in fact a lefty trojan horse. The link of this obviously liberal friendly website is found by clicking the title of this article above.
"Conservative, Liberal and NDP Youth from Ontario Congratulate Parliament for Defeating Harper Amendments to Bill C-38 AUDIO: Andrew Teliszewsky, President of the Ontario Young Liberals comments on young Canadians from all parties standing up to Stephen Harper (http://www.youngliberals.ca/documents/oyl_e.mp3) The leaders of the Ontario PC Youth Association, the Ontario Young Liberals and the Ontario New Democratic Youth banded together on Tuesday, April 12, 2005, in a rare show of cross-party unity to congratulate Parliament for defeating Stephen Harper’s motion to kill the government’s Same-Sex Marriage Bill."
It is becoming painfully clear now that Belinda was in fact a liberal in sheep's clothing trying to infiltrate the conservative party. That Stephen Harper did not fall for this is quite commendable on his part. I also believe that the struggle between Stephen and Peter McKay at the Montreal convention was in fact engineered by Belinda.
Also, one may surmise that along with Belinda's role as spy came the sexual favours that she showered on Peter as a way to increase her ability to penetrate the conservative movement in Canada.
What is more concerning at the moment is the relationship between Belinda and the following old-guard PC's: Brian Mulroney, Mike Harris and William Davis amongst others. Were these people behind Belinda in her double cross as well as her obvious defection to the safe side' at the opportune moment as she was being found out? We will soon know.
Lastly, what is Belinda's obsession with gay marriage all about? This is a person from a family that would crush union rights, worker's rights, and steam roller you in a business deal if they could, but they have a real big and soft heart for gays for some reason? I mean I can understand why gays or even the opportunistic left want gay rights but it does not make any sense for Belinda. I'm sure that her hair-dresser may be gay and some of her clothing designer friends, but they don't need any protecting from bad people like me do they? There is something very weird about all of this that does not make logical sense.
Furthermore, why do they have to push gay rights onto conservatives when anybody knows that Liberals and the NDP are offering it freely. Very strange indeed.
Monday, May 23, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I knew Belinda was big on the youth thing, and I read about that letter from the young party leaders a few weeks ago, but I never put two and two together.
Interesting.
Canadi-anna:
I think all this makes sense if we can only go high enough and just look down...
My take on it is the Libs (who probably, based on 34 or so voting against ssm (excluding the cabinet ministers that voted for it against their conscience and/or constituents preference, not that I'll be rubbin' the Screecher's face in it, no no no) KNOW they can pull "hidden agenda" out of their pocket on this one. I've read a few articles that expect this to die on the vine should the Libs stay in power very long as they realize that the majority of Canadians - new or old - don't really buy into it. If you look at Harper's proposed amendment, it allowed the 'hard right' to maintain 'marriage' but gave a 'civil union' the same rights... a compromise.
So why didn't the Libs vote for it? It was all about semantics, so they'd have 'won' with that amendment. But I don't think they want to win (on SSM, anyway).
Watch it get held in committee for ohhhh however many months it takes for an election to take place (when the Libs want it) - and then they can pull out the SSM skeleton and show how the CPC single-handedly blocked it (which they actually didn't, but hey, technicalities).
What I'd like to see happen, now that it looks like Parliament may hang out for months on end until Pauly drops the writ, is for someone like Ed Broadbent, who has already stated his desire to retire 'due to his wife's health' to say he's done, he's gone, call a by-election. That could get interesting.
There are a lot of Libs retiring this time around, and they may have thought, upon announcement, that they'd be done by now...
kinda makes you go "hmmmmm..."
You make good points in regards the liberals machinations.
The reason that Paulie has to pass SSM is that he has been ordered to by his masters. This is what I know. The rumour going around is that he wanted little to do with it, it is a no-win deal really. It may end up being a burning tire around his neck.
I fully expect in the next 6 to 12 months for the liberals to try to re-invent themselves to pass off as rejuvenated! All for the cynical purpose of retaining power at any cost. I would also expect the old cynical gang to hang in the background to ensure control of the mandate. It is even possible that Belinda was brought in to take off for PMPM.
Post a Comment