Thursday, June 02, 2005

EC Debacle: A lesson for North America?

Now Britain admits that the rush to vote and hopefully join the EC is on the backburner. An excerpt from the story (link is at the title above):

"But the Prime Minister was fighting behind the scenes against pressure from France and Germany to go through the motions of holding a UK referendum - which ministers think would end in an even bigger rejection.
The Dutch voted by 61.6 per cent to 38.4 against the blueprint for Europe's future after a campaign highlighting anger at rising inflation, immigration and loss of sovereignty. Mr Alexander said: "These two no votes leave the constitutional treaty in serious difficulties ... but it is not for one country to declare it dead."


The problem is that international globalists have no interest in listening to the people that buy their products, pay their salaries or vote them in. Now we have the defiance of Tony Blair even though he dare not hold a vote because he knows it will go down to certain defeat. The strategy of the socialistic/globalists is to keep trying until you get lucky. Sorta of like the inebriated man's strategy in picking up a woman at the corner pub.

What lessons are there for North America? Three main lessons to be learned: First - as I note above, consult with the electorate and populace as much as possible. Second - design strategies and programs to protect the most vulnerable people as much as reasonably possible. The more painful this process will be the more it will be rejected. Canadians certainly remember the pains and pangs of Free-trade which was sold as painless.' Third and final - Immigration, immigration and immigration. Do not ignore the pain caused to the general populace by the onslaught of immigration that is often not needed, or well thought out and planned for or justified.

A one world order that only benefits the billionaires and stars' of the world will be rejected by the rest of the world.

2 comments:

Candace said...

"These two no votes leave the constitutional treaty in serious difficulties ... but it is not for one country to declare it dead."

I thought that the constitution required "unanimous" assent?

How is it not "dead"? Is that kinda like PMPM & his merry crew deciding that if they lose a non-confidence vote, they can just float a confidence vote and win it? wft is going on in this world anyway?

Walsh Writes said...

LOL! you got me?

I guess the idea is that you keep trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the public until they give up.